Started by Ari Avraham. Last reply by James Wood Jr. Oct 12, 2009.
Comment
Thanks Ted, for the Atkinson paper. Edenics boils down to phonemes too, the smallest element of meaning captured by two root consonants. With Edenic sub-roots we have made a crack in the Great Wall of Chinese. I hope to get the material on the click languages. Otherwise I had to shrug and guess that they were not from Adam and Eve, who got the ist Modern Human Language at Eden.
50,000 years ago? Like the palentologists of the "I love Lucy" crowd and the "Out of Africa" thinkers....... their findings are irrelevant to Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Whatever grunt-signals pre-Modern Men made is of no interest to Edenics. The Nostraticists are more correct in that Modern (real) languages were diversified near Turkey. Shinar, to be exact.
25 years ago the Big Bang was fought. Today, only the lunatic fringe doesn't accept a moment of Creation. Only Genesis 11 and Edenics explains the Big Bang of language diversity. Even adding 50K years and more miles does not explain why language families have variations of Biblical Hebrew roots and sub-roots. Theories are slowly slouching toward Babel to be born.
:/post.ly/1ow4T
Isaac, check this out! http://www.metafilter.com/102581/The-Origin-of-All-Language
This work could potentially enhance yours; someone finally connected the African Bushman clicks and Chinese sing-song sounds to the same sounds that the rest of the world uses; this could be the final missing link to extend Edenics to ALL languages, including the sing-song Asian and clicky-clacky South African languages.
http://www.metafilter.com/102581/The-Origin-of-All-Language
Started by Ari Avraham. Last reply by James Wood Jr. Oct 12, 2009.
© 2012 Created by Ross Nichols.
You need to be a member of The Hebrew Origin of Human Language to add comments!